BNSF’s Intermodal Container ‘Matchmaking’ Program a Win-Win-Win
By SUSAN GREEN
BNSF Staff Writer
Shipping containers come from overseas to U.S. ports every day loaded full of imports like electronics, toys, footwear, clothes – just about anything you can buy in big box stores. But what happens to those containers once they’re unloaded from trains or trucks? Most are transported back to the port empty, reducing efficiency and increasing costs.
To help ocean carriers manage their logistics and support efficiency in their supply chains, BNSF offers Intermodal service into several private Intermodal facilities through a program called Matchback.
The strategy increases utilization out of each container by reloading those 20- and 40-foot boxes with export commodities, moving them on a train to the West Coast for transport by ship to points beyond. The program “matches back” the container with a different product, turning an otherwise empty trip into a revenue-generating one.
“We’ve been offering this service to ocean carriers for nearly two decades,” explained Ben Murray, director of sales for BNSF’s Consumer Products team. “It offers the potential to move more than air back in those containers.”
Under Matchback, BNSF partners with ocean carriers and logistics companies to move empty containers from our intermodal hubs to those logistic companies’ Intermodal facilities, where they are then reloaded onto a new train and sent back to West Coast ports. From there they’re loaded onto ships bound for China and other Southeast Asia countries.
One of the companies BNSF works with is Rail Modal Group (RMG), which owns and operates inland ports at Amarillo, Texas; Fremont, Nebraska; and Minot, North Dakota. RMG, BNSF’s largest Matchback partner, averages 15-20 trains a month and recently loaded its 1,000th train for BNSF out of Minot.
RMG supports the Matchback program by repositioning containers to underserved protein and agricultural product export markets, like Fremont. Producers at these locations need sustainable ways to move their freight other than by long-haul trucking that may require transloading, both of which add cost.
At RMG’s facilities there’s track for up to two trains at a time, and their tracks connect with BNSF’s main line. When RMG receives empty containers, they dray (truck) them to local producers that can load bulk as well as refrigerated commodities.
“We have storage and the ability to load many different types of commodities,” said Todd Whitmore, RMG’s chief commercial officer. “Cargo can include products like soybean meal, dried distillers’ grains (DDGs), cotton, whey powder, frozen beef and pork, animal hides and resins. We call them ‘grocery trains’ because of the diverse nature of the commodities on board.”
Once the containers are filled, RMG returns them to its nearby facility, loads them onto the planned full train, all while working with BNSF on finalizing the outbound train plan. When that outbound train has been released, RMG has already secured spots for each container on the ocean carriers’ vessels and then monitors them until they get to their ports of destination. At destination, the containers are unloaded by the customer. For products like grain, they use container unloaders that lift and tip the container, allowing the grain to flow out.
“We are an integrated supply chain company,” said Whitmore. “In addition to owning
and operating the intermodal assets, we provide full, door-to-door logistics solutions for local producers — handling everything from export documentation to specialized refrigerated services for the country’s largest protein producers. In essence, we’re connecting stakeholders in a complicated logistics process and making it seamless.”
It’s a win-win-win situation. The railroad and the ocean carrier get loaded moves going both directions, and customers have more container supply where they need it. You might say… it’s a perfect match.
This article was originally posted on September 11th, 2025 on bnsf.com/news-media
A conversation about planning the next step in graduate education seems most useful to me when it leaves space for uncertainty and further questions. A clear research interest can make a programme comparison more meaningful than a list of rankings. It makes me curious about the practical side of graduate study planning. I would probably come back to this question after trying to work through one concrete example rather than deciding immediately. What would help you decide whether a programme fits your learning goals?
There is something approachable about discussing discovering the cultural heritage of Lusatia through situations people can actually picture. Language and local stories can reveal connections that are easy to miss on a map. That is the kind of detail I would keep in mind while exploring Lusatian cultural heritage. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. How would you introduce regional heritage through a classroom project?
I find using the local environment in Zalesie lessons easier to think about when there is a concrete question to start from. A short walk can provide material for science, writing and observation in the same lesson. Seen this way, Zalesie outdoor learning becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. How can an outdoor activity stay focused without losing its sense of discovery?
My first thought about sharing cultures through language learning is that the everyday experience deserves as much attention as the larger explanation. An everyday conversation can reveal cultural habits that a vocabulary list cannot explain. Seen this way, European cultural exchange becomes a topic to explore rather than something to sum up too quickly. I can imagine different answers depending on the situation, so I would want to understand the context before drawing conclusions. What kinds of shared activities make an exchange feel meaningful?
Considering making online counselling easier to approach, I keep coming back to the difference between knowing about an idea and putting it into practice. Knowing how a first conversation works can reduce uncertainty about asking for support. It gives me a more concrete starting point for thinking about online counselling information. A short discussion of an everyday example would make this easier for me to connect with, especially as someone still learning about the subject. What practical information should be available before someone books an online session?